De Havilland Mosquito

The de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito was a British multi-role combat aircraft, with a two-man crew, that served during the Second World War and the postwar era. The Mosquito was one of the few operational, front-line aircraft to be constructed almost entirely of wood and, as such, was nicknamed "The Wooden Wonder".[3] It was also known affectionately as the "Mossie" to its crews[4] Originally conceived as an unarmed fast bomber, the Mosquito was adapted to many other roles during the air war, including: low- to medium-altitude daytime tactical bomber, high-altitude night bomber, pathfinder, day or night fighter, fighter-bomber, intruder, maritime strike aircraft, and fast photo-reconnaissance aircraft. It was also used by the British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC) as a transport.[5]

When the Mosquito entered production in 1941, it was one of the fastest operational aircraft in the world.[6] Entering widespread service in 1942, the Mosquito first operated as a high-speed, high-altitude photo-reconnaissance aircraft, and continued to operate in this role throughout the war. From mid-1942 to mid-1943 Mosquito bombers were used in high-speed, medium- or low-altitude missions, attacking factories, railways and other pinpoint targets within Germany and German-occupied Europe. From late 1943, Mosquito bomber units were formed into the Light Night Strike Force and used as pathfinders for RAF Bomber Command's heavy-bomber raids. They were also used as "nuisance" bombers, often dropping 4,000 lb (1,812 kg) "Cookies", in high-altitude, high-speed raids that German night fighters were almost powerless to intercept.

As a night fighter, from mid-1942, the Mosquito was used to intercept Luftwaffe raids on the United Kingdom, most notably defeating the German aerial offensive, Operation Steinbock, in 1944. Offensively, starting in late 1942, some Mosquito night-fighter units conducted intruder raids over Luftwaffe airfields and, as part of 100 Group, the Mosquito was used as a night fighter and intruder in support of RAF Bomber Command's heavy bombers, and played an important role in reducing bomber losses during 1944 and 1945.[7] [nb 1] As a fighter-bomber in the Second Tactical Air Force, the Mosquito took part in "special raids", such as the attack on Amiens Prison in early 1944, and in other precision attacks against Gestapo or German intelligence and security forces. 2 TAF Mosquitos also played an important role operating in tactical support of the British Army during the 1944 Normandy Campaign. From 1943 Mosquitos were used by RAF Coastal Command strike squadrons, attacking Kriegsmarine U-boats (particularly in the 1943 Bay of Biscay offensive, where significant numbers of U-boats were sunk or damaged) and intercepting transport ship concentrations.

The Mosquito saw service with the Royal Air Force (RAF) and many other air forces in the European theatre, and the Mediterranean and Italian theatres. The Mosquito was also used by the RAF in the South East Asian theatre, and by the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) based in the Halmaheras and Borneo during the Pacific War. {| class="toc" id="toc"

Contents
[hide] *1 Development
 * 1.1 Air Ministry bomber requirements and concepts
 * 1.2 Inception of the De Havilland fast bomber
 * 1.3 Project Mosquito
 * 1.4 Prototypes and test flights
 * 1.5 Production plans and American interest
 * 2 Design
 * 2.1 Overview
 * 2.2 Construction
 * 2.3 Systems
 * 2.4 Flight characteristics
 * 3 Operational history
 * 3.1 Göring's comments
 * 4 Variants
 * 4.1 Prototypes
 * 4.2 Photo-reconnaissance
 * 4.3 Bombers
 * 4.4 Fighters
 * 4.5 Night fighters
 * 4.6 Fighter-bombers
 * 4.7 Trainers
 * 4.8 Torpedo-bombers
 * 4.9 Target tugs
 * 4.10 Canadian-built
 * 4.11 Australian-built
 * 4.12 Highball
 * 5 Production
 * 5.1 Details
 * 5.2 Sites
 * 6 Operators
 * 7 Survivors
 * 8 Specifications
 * 8.1 DH.98 Mosquito F Mk II
 * 8.2 DH.98 Mosquito B Mk XVI
 * 9 Notable appearances in media
 * 10 See also
 * 11 References
 * 11.1 Notes
 * 11.2 Citations
 * 11.3 Bibliography
 * 12 External links
 * }

Development
Construction concepts pioneered in the de Havilland Comet were later used in the Mosquito.By the early-mid 1930s, de Havilland established a reputation for innovative high-speed aircraft with the DH.88 Comet racer, while the later DH.91 Albatross airliner successfully pioneered the composite wood construction that the Mosquito would use. The 22-passenger Albatross could cruise at 210 miles per hour (340 km/h) at 11,000 feet (3,400 m), a vast improvement on the 100 miles per hour (160 km/h) Handley Page H.P.42 and other biplanes it was replacing.[8] The wooden monocoque construction not only saved weight and compensated for the low power of the de Havilland Gipsy Twelve engines used by this aircraft, but simplified production and reduced construction time.[9]

Air Ministry bomber requirements and concepts
On 8 September 1936, the British Air Ministry issued Specification P.13/36, which called for a twin-engined medium bomber capable of carrying a bomb load of 3,000 pounds (1,400 kg) for 3,000 miles (4,800 km) with a maximum speed of 275 miles per hour (443 km/h) at 15,000 feet (4,600 m); a maximum bomb load of 8,000 pounds (3,600 kg) which could be carried over shorter ranges was also specified.[10] Major aviation firms entered heavy designs with new high-powered engines and multiple defensive turrets, leading to the production of the Avro Manchester and Handley Page Halifax.[11]

In May 1937, as a comparison to P.13/36, George Volkert, who was the chief designer of Handley Page, put forward to the Air Ministry the concept of a fast unarmed bomber. In his 20-page document, Volkert laid out plans for an aerodynamically clean medium bomber that would carry 3,000 pounds (1,400 kg) of bombs at a cruising speed of 300 miles per hour (480 km/h). There was some support for the idea in the RAF and Air Ministry; for example a Captain Liptrot, who was then Research Director Aircraft 3 (RDA3), appraised Volkert's design, calculating that its top speed would exceed that of the brand new Supermarine Spitfire. There were, however, counter-arguments that, although such a design had merit, it would not necessarily maintain a speed advantage over enemy fighters for long.[12] The Ministry was also considering the use of non-strategic materials for aircraft production, which, in 1938, led to specification B.9/38 and the development of the Albemarle medium bomber, which was largely constructed from spruce and plywood attached to a steel-tube frame. Thus it can be seen that the idea of a small, fast bomber, possibly made out of non-strategic materials, was already gaining support at a much earlier stage than is sometimes acknowledged.[13]

Inception of the De Havilland fast bomber
One of de Havilland's early design concepts was to adapt the de Havilland Albatross design to become a fast, turret-armed bomber.Another designer who believed that meeting the P.13/36 specification would lead to a mediocre aircraft was Geoffrey de Havilland, who felt that an aerodynamically clean design, with minimal skin area, was a good concept for a bomber. He initially thought that adapting the Albatross airliner to meet the RAF's requirements was a time-saving possibility. In April 1938, performance estimates were produced of a twin Rolls-Royce Merlin powered DH.91, with the Bristol Hercules and Napier Sabre as alternatives.[10] On 7 July 1938, Geoffrey de Havilland sent a letter to Air Marshal Wilfred Freeman, the Air Council's member for Research and Development, discussing the specification and arguing that in the event of war, there would be shortages of materials such as duralumin or steel, while there should be plentiful supplies of wood. Additionally, although inferior torsionally, the strength to weight ratio of wood was as good as that of duralumin or steel, and, given such considerations, a different approach to designing a high-speed bomber was possible.[10]

After further consideration, in a follow-up letter sent to Freeman on 27 July, de Havilland stated that the P.13/36 specification could not be met by a twin Merlin powered aircraft and that either the top speed or load carrying capacity would be compromised, depending on which was paramount. For example, a larger, slower, turret armed aircraft would have a range of 1,500 miles (2,400 km) carrying a 4,000 lb (1,800 kg) bomb load, with a maximum speed of 260 miles per hour (420 km/h) at 19,000 feet (5,800 m), and a cruising speed of 230 miles per hour (370 km/h) at 18,000 feet (5,500 m). De Havilland believed that such a concept was too much of a compromise, and that getting rid of some surplus equipment would lead to a better design.[10] On 4 October 1938, for example, de Havilland projected the performance of another design based on the D.H 91 Albatross, powered by two Merlin Xs, with a three-man crew and armed with six or eight forward firing guns, plus one or two manually operated guns and a tail turret. Based on a total loaded weight of 19,000 pounds (8,600 kg) it would have a top speed of 300 miles per hour (480 km/h) and cruising speed of 268 miles per hour (431 km/h) at 22,500 feet (6,900 m).[11]

Still believing that this performance could be improved upon, and after examining more concepts based on the Albatross and the new all-metal DH.95 Flamingo, de Havilland settled on designing a completely new aircraft that would be aerodynamically clean, of wooden construction and powered by the Merlin, which offered promise of substantial future development.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Sharb31_11-2">[11] The new design would be faster than all current or foreseeable enemy fighter aircraft, and could dispense with a defensive armament, which would only slow it down and make interception or losses to anti-aircraft guns more likely. Instead, high speed and good manoeuvrability would make it easier for the design to evade both fighters and ground fire.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Sharb31_11-3">[11] Also, the lack of turrets meant that production would be simplified and production time reduced, with a delivery rate far in advance of any competing designs. Without armament, the crew could be reduced to a pilot and a navigator. This was in contrast to contemporary RAF design philosophy, which required well-armed heavy bombers and was much more akin to the German schnellbomber concept.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._5._14-0">[14] However, during a meeting held in early October 1938 between Geoffrey de Havilland, Charles C Walker (de Havilland's chief engineer) and Air Ministry officials, the latter showed little interest in de Havilland's concept and, instead, asked de Havilland to build wings for other bombers as a sub-contractor.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._6._15-0">[15]

By September 1939 de Havilland had produced preliminary estimates for both single- and twin-engined variations of light-bomber designs using different engines, while speculating on the effects of defensive armament on their designs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Buttler.2C_p78_16-0">[16] One design, completed on 6 September, was for an aircraft powered by a single 2,000 hp (1,500 kW) Napier Sabre, with a wingspan of 47-foot (14 m) and capable of carrying a 1,000 lb (450 kg) bomb load 1,500 miles (2,400 km). On 20 September, in another letter to Wilfred Freeman, Geoffrey de Havilland wrote "...we believe that we could produce a twin-engine bomber which would have a performance so outstanding that little defensive equipment would be needed."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Buttler.2C_p78_16-1">[16] By 4 October work had progressed to a twin engine light bomber with a wingspan of 51 ft 3 in (15.62 m), and powered by either Merlin or Griffon engines, with the Merlin being favoured because of its immediate availability.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Buttler.2C_p78_16-2">[16]

On 5 October 1939, with the Second World War a month old, the nucleus of a design team under the leadership of Eric Bishop, de Havilland's chief designer, moved to the security and secrecy of Salisbury Hall and started work on what was now known as the DH.98.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Sharb34_17-0">[17] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-19">[nb 2] With an eye to making the DH.98 more versatile, Bishop made provision for four 20 mm cannon which could be installed in the forward half of the bomb bay, immediately under the cockpit, and firing via blast tubes and troughs under the forward fuselage.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._11._20-0">[19]

The DH.98 was still too radical for the Air Ministry, which continued to want a heavily armed, multi-role aircraft, combining medium bomber, reconnaissance and "general purpose" roles, as well as being capable of maritime strike, for which torpedo carrying equipment was specified.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._6._15-1">[15] With the outbreak of the war, the Air Ministry became more receptive, but were still sceptical about sanctioning an unarmed bomber and thought that the Germans would produce fighters which were faster than expected.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-21">[20] Instead, the Ministry asked de Havilland to compromise and suggested two forward and two rear firing machine guns for defence.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bow0510_22-0">[21] The Air Ministry also opposed a two-man bomber, wanting at the very least a third crewman to reduce the workload of the others on long flights.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._11._20-1">[19] The Air Council then added further requirements, such as remotely controlled guns, a top speed of 275 miles per hour (443 km/h) at 15,000 feet (4,600 m) on two-thirds engine power, and a range of 3,000 miles (4,800 km) with a 4,000 lb (1,800 kg) bomb load.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bow0510_22-1">[21] To appease the Air Ministry, de Havilland built several mock-ups with a gun turret just aft of the cockpit, but, apart from this compromise, de Havilland made no changes to the fundamentals of the design.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._11._20-2">[19]

On 12 November, at a meeting considering fast bomber ideas put forward by de Havilland, Blackburn, and Bristol, Marshal W. Freeman directed de Havilland to produce a fast aircraft, powered initially by Merlin engines, with options of using progressively more powerful engines, including the Rolls-Royce Griffon and the Napier Sabre. Although estimates for a slightly larger Griffon powered aircraft, armed with a four-gun tail turret, were presented, Freeman was able to get the requirement for defensive weapons dropped, and a draft requirement was raised calling for a high-speed light reconnaissance bomber capable of 400 miles per hour (640 km/h) at 18,000 feet (5,500 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-23">[22]

One month later, on 12 December 1939, the Vice-Chief of the Air Staff, Director General of Research and Development, Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief (AOC-in-C) of RAF Bomber Command met to finalise the details of the design and decide how it was to fit within the RAF's strategic aims. The AOC-in-C still would not accept an unarmed bomber, but insisted it would be suitable for reconnaissance missions with either F8 or F24 cameras.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._12._24-0">[23] After representatives of the company, the Air Ministry and the RAF's operational commands had examined a full scale mock-up at Hatfield on 29 December 1939, the project finally received official backing.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bu80_25-0">[24] This was confirmed on 1 January 1940, when Air Marshal Freeman chaired another meeting with Geoffrey de Havilland, John Buchanan, (Deputy of Aircraft Production) and John Connolly, who was Buchanan's chief of staff. Claiming the DH.98 was the "fastest bomber in the world", de Havilland added "it must be useful". Freeman supported its production for RAF service and ordered a single prototype for an unarmed bomber variant to specification B.1/40/dh, which called for a light bomber/reconnaissance aircraft powered by two 1,280 hp (950 kW) Rolls-Royce RM3SM (experimental designation for what became known as the Merlin 21) with ducted radiators, capable of carrying a 1,000 lb (450 kg) bomb load.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Sharb34_17-1">[17] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._12._24-1">[23] The aircraft was to have a speed of 397 miles per hour (639 km/h) at 23,700 feet (7,200 m) and a cruising speed of 327 miles per hour (526 km/h) at 26,600 feet (8,100 m) with a range of 1,480 miles (2,380 km) at 24,900 feet (7,600 m) on full tanks. Maximum service ceiling was to be 32,100 feet (9,800 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._12._24-2">[23]

On 1 March 1940, Air Marshal Roderic Hill issued a contract under Specification B.1/40, for 50 bomber-reconnaissance variants of the DH.98: this contract included the prototype, which was given the factory serial E0234.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-26">[25] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-27">[26] In May 1940, specification F.21/40 was issued, calling for a long-range fighter armed with four 20mm cannon and four .303 machine guns in the nose, after which de Havilland were authorised to build a prototype of a fighter version of the DH.98. It was decided after some debate, that this prototype, given the serial number W4052, would carry Airborne Interception (AI) Mk.IV equipment as a day and night fighter.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-28">[nb 3] By June 1940, the DH.98 had been given the name "Mosquito".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bu80_25-1">[24] Having the fighter variant helped keep the Mosquito project alive because there was still plenty of criticism over the usefulness of an unarmed bomber within the government and Air Ministry, even after the first prototype had flown and shown its capabilities.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bu80_25-2">[24]

Project Mosquito
A 1943 advertisement for de Havilland taken from Flight & Aircraft Engineer magazine highlights the speed of the B Mk IVOnce the design of the DH.98 had started, de Havilland built several mock-ups, the most detailed of which was at Salisbury Hall, in the hangar where E0234 was being built. Initially, this mock-up was designed with the crew completely enclosed in the fuselage behind a completely transparent nose (similar to that of the Bristol Blenheim or Heinkel He 111H), but this was quickly altered to a more solid nose with a more conventional canopy.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-29">[27]

The construction of the prototype began in March 1940, but work was cancelled again after the Battle of Dunkirk, when Lord Beaverbrook, as Minister of Aircraft Production decided there was no production capacity for aircraft like the DH.98, which was not expected to be in service until early 1941. Although Lord Beaverbrook told Air Vice-Marshal Freeman that work on the project had better stop, he did not issue a specific instruction, and Freeman ignored the request.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-30">[28] In June 1940, however, Lord Beaverbrook and the Air Staff ordered that production was to focus on five existing types, namely the Supermarine Spitfire, Hawker Hurricane, Vickers Wellington, Armstrong-Whitworth Whitley and the Bristol Blenheim.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._12._24-3">[23] Work on the DH.98 prototype stopped, and it seemed that the project would be shut down when the design team were denied the materials with which to build their prototype.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._7._31-0">[29]

The Mosquito was only reinstated as a priority in July 1940, after de Havilland's General Manager L.C.L Murray, promised Lord Beaverbrook 50 Mosquitoes by December 1941, and this, only after Beaverbrook was satisfied that Mosquito production would not hinder de Havilland's primary work of producing Tiger Moth and Oxford trainers and repairing Hurricanes as well as the licence manufacture of Merlin engines.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._7._31-1">[29] In promising Beaverbrook 50 Mosquitoes by the end of 1941, de Havilland was taking a gamble, because it was unlikely that 50 Mosquitos could be built in such a limited time; as it transpired only 20 Mosquitos were built in 1941, but the other 30 were delivered by mid-March 1942.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-32">[30]

During the Battle of Britain, nearly a third of de Havilland's factory time was lost because the workers took cover in the factory's bomb shelters.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-33">[31] Nevertheless, work on the prototype went quickly, such that E0234 was rolled out on 19 November 1940.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-34">[32]

In the aftermath of the Battle of Britain, the original order was changed to 20 bomber variants and 30 fighters. It was still uncertain whether the fighter version should have dual or single controls, or should carry a turret, so three prototypes were eventually built: W4052, W4053 and W4073. The latter, both turret armed, were later disarmed, to become the prototypes for the T.III trainer.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-35">[33] This caused some delays as half-built wing components had to be strengthened for the expected higher combat load requirements. The nose sections also had to be altered, omitting the clear perspex bomb-aimer's position, to solid noses designed to house four .303 machine guns and their ammunition.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._6._15-2">[15]

Prototypes and test flights
On 3 November 1940, the aircraft, still coded E0234, was transported by road to Hatfield, and placed in a small blast-proof assembly building, where successful engine runs were made on 19 November. Two Merlin 21 two-speed single-stage supercharged engines were installed driving three-bladed de Havilland Hydromatic constant-speed, controllable-pitch propellers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._18._36-0">[34] E0234 had a wingspan of 52 ft 2 in (15.90 m) and was the only Mosquito to be built with Handley Page slats on the outer leading edges of the wings. Test flights showed that these were not needed and they were disconnected and faired over with doped fabric (these slats can still be seen on W4050).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-37">[35] On 24 November 1940, taxiing trials were carried out by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_de_Havilland,_Jr. Geoffrey de Havilland, Jr. ], who was the company's chief test pilot and responsible for maiden flights. The tests were successful and the prototype was subsequently readied for flight testing, making its first flight piloted by Geoffrey de Havilland, on 25 November. The flight was made 11 months after the start of detailed design work, a remarkable achievement considering the conditions of the time.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._6._15-3">[15]

For this maiden flight, E0234, weighing 14,150 lbs (6,420 kg), took off from a 450-foot (140 m) field beside the shed it was built in. John E. Walker, Chief Engine Installation designer, accompanied de Havilland. The takeoff was "straight forward and easy" and the undercarriage was not retracted until a considerable height was obtained.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thir25_38-0">[36] The aircraft reached 220 mph (350 km/h), with the only problem being the undercarriage doors - which were operated by bungee cords attached to the main undercarriage legs - that remained open by some 12 inches (300 mm) at that speed.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thir25_38-1">[36] This problem persisted for some time. The left wing of E0234 also had a tendency to drag to port slightly, so a rigging adjustment was carried out before further flights.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._18._36-1">[34] Mosquito prototype W4050 landing after a test flight on 10 January 1941. Four test flights were flown that day.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-39">[37] On 5 December 1940, the prototype experienced tail buffeting at speeds between 240 miles per hour (390 km/h) and 255 miles per hour (410 km/h). The pilot noticed this most in the control column, with handling becoming more difficult. During testing on 10 December, wool tufts were attached to the suspect areas to investigate the direction of airflow. The conclusion was that the airflow separating from rear section of the inner engine nacelles was disturbed, leading to a localised stall and the disturbed airflow was striking the tailplane, causing the buffeting. In an attempt to smooth the air flow and deflect it from striking the tailplane with such force, the company experimented with non-retractable slots, fitted to the inner engine nacelles and to the leading edge of the tailplane.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-40">[38] These slots, and wing root fairings fitted to the forward fuselage and leading edge of the radiator intakes, stopped some of the vibration experienced by the pilot but failed to cure the tailplane buffeting.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-41">[39] In February 1941, the buffeting was eliminated by incorporating triangular fillets on the trailing edge of the wings and lengthening the nacelles, the trailing edge of which curved up to fair into the fillet some 10 in (250 mm) behind the wing's trailing edge: this meant the flaps had to be divided into inboard and outboard sections.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._19._42-0">[40] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-44">[nb 4]

By January 1941, the prototype was carrying the military serial number W4050.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._6._15-4">[15] With the buffeting problems largely resolved, John Cunningham flew W4050 on 9 February 1941. He was greatly impressed by the "lightness of the controls and generally pleasant handling characteristics". Cunningham concluded that when the type was fitted with AI equipment, it would be a perfect replacement for the Bristol Beaufighter.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._19._42-1">[40]

During its trials on 16 January 1941, W4050 outpaced a Spitfire at 6,000 ft (1,800 m). The original estimates were that as the Mosquito prototype had twice the surface area and over twice the weight of the Spitfire Mk II, but also with twice its power, the Mosquito would end up being 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) faster. Over the next few months, W4050 surpassed this estimate, easily beating the Spitfire Mk II in testing at RAF Boscombe Down in February 1941, reaching a top speed of 392 miles per hour (631 km/h) at 22,000 feet (6,700 m) altitude, compared to a top speed of 360 miles per hour (580 km/h) at 19,500 feet (5,900 m) for the Spitfire.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._8._0-1">[1] On 19 February, official trials began at the Aeroplane and Armament Experimental Establishment (A&AEE) based at Boscombe Down, although de Havilland's representative was surprised by a delay in starting the tests.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Sharb445_45-0">[42] On 24 February, as W4050 taxied across the rough airfield, the tailwheel jammed leading to the fuselage fracturing: this was replaced by the fuselage of the Photo-Reconnaissance prototype W4051 in early March.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-46">[nb 5] In spite of this setback, the Initial Handling Report 767 issued by the A&AEE stated "The aeroplane is pleasant to fly ... Aileron control light and effective ..." The maximum speed reached was 388 mph (624 km/h) at 22,000 ft (6,700 m), with an estimated maximum ceiling of 33,900 ft (10,300 m) and a maximum rate of climb of 2,880 ft/min (880 m/min) at 11,400 ft (3,500 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Sharb445_45-1">[42]

W4050 continued to be used for long and varied testing programs, being essentially the experimental "workhorse" for the Mosquito family.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-47">[43] In late October 1941, it was taken back to the factory to be fitted with Merlin 61s, the first production Merlins fitted with a two-speed, two-stage supercharger. The first flight with the new engines was on 20 June 1942.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-48">[44] W4050 recorded a maximum speed of 428 mph (689 km/h) at 28,500 ft (8,700 m) (fitted with straight-through air intakes with snowguards, engines in F.S gear) and 437 mph (703 km/h) at 29,200 ft (8,900 m) without snowguards.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thr34_49-0">[45] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-50">[nb 6] In October 1942, in connection with development work on the NF Mk XV, W4050 was fitted with extended wingtips increasing the span to 59 ft 2 in (18.03 m), first flying in this configuration on 8 December.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-51">[46] Finally, fitted with high-altitude rated two-stage, two-speed Merlin 77s, it reached 439 miles per hour (707 km/h) in December 1943.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._21._5-1">[6] Soon after these flights,W4050 was grounded and was scheduled to be scrapped, but instead continued to serve as an instructional airframe at Hatfield. In September 1958, W4050 was returned to the Salisbury Hall hangar in which it had been built, was restored to its original configuration and is now one of the primary exhibits of the de Havilland Aircraft Heritage Centre.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-52">[47] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-53">[48] W4050 being restored at the de Havilland Aircraft Heritage Centre near St Albans.W4051, which was designed from the outset to be the prototype for the photo-reconnaissance versions of the Mosquito, was slated to make its first flight in early 1941. However, the fuselage fracture in W4050 meant that W4051's fuselage was used as a replacement; W4051 was then rebuilt using a production standard fuselage and first flew on 10 June 1941. This prototype continued to use the short engine nacelles, single-piece trailing edge flaps and the 19 ft 5.5 in (5.931 m) "No. 1" tailplane used by W4050, but had production standard 54 ft 2 in (16.51 m) wings and, thus configured, became the only Mosquito prototype to fly operationally.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thirsk_2006.2C_p._269_54-0">[49]

Construction of the fighter prototype, W4052 was also carried out at the secret Salisbury Hall facility. The new prototype differed from its bomber brethren in a number of ways. It was powered by 1,460 hp (1,090 kW) Merlin 21s and had an altered canopy structure with a flat bullet-proof windscreen. Four 20 mm (.79 in) Hispano Mk II cannon were housed in a compartment under the cockpit floor, with the breeches projecting into the bomb bay. The bomb bay doors were replaced by manually operated bay doors which incorporated cartridge ejector chutes.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thirsk_2006.2C_pp._125.2C_134_55-0">[50] The solid nose mounted four .303 in (7.7 mm) Browning machine guns and their ammunition boxes which were accessed by a single large, sideways hinged panel.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-56">[51] In accordance with its role as a day/night fighter prototype W4052 was equipped with AI Mk.IV equipment, complete with an "arrowhead"-shaped transmission aerial mounted between the central Brownings, and receiving aerials through each outer wingtip, and it was painted in overall black RDM2a "Special Night" finish.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-57">[52] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-59">[nb 7] It was also the first prototype constructed with the extended engine nacelles.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-60">[54]

W4052 was later tested with other modifications including bomb racks, drop tanks, barrage balloon cable cutters in the leading edge of the wings, Hamilton airscrews and braking propellers, as well as drooping aileron systems which enabled steep approaches, and a larger rudder tab. The prototype continued to serve as a test machine until it was scrapped on 28 January 1946.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._21._5-2">[6] W4055 flew the first operational Mosquito flight on 17 September 1941.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._20._61-0">[55]

During flight testing, the Mosquito prototypes were modified to test a number of experimental configurations. W4050 was fitted with a turret behind the cockpit for drag tests, after which the idea was abandoned in July 1941. W4052 had the first version of the Youngman Frill airbrake fitted to the fighter prototype. The frill was opened by bellows and venturi effect to provide rapid deceleration during interceptions and was tested between January - August 1942, but was also abandoned when it was discovered that lowering the undercarriage had the same effect with less buffeting.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._20._61-1">[55]

Early on in the Mosquito's operational life, the cooling intake shrouds that were to cool the exhausts on production aircraft overheated after a while. Flame dampers prevented exhaust glow on night operations, but they had an effect on performance. Multiple ejector and open-ended exhaust stubs helped solve the problem and were used in the PR.VIII, B.IX and B.XVI variants. This increased speed performance in the B.IX alone by 10–13 miles (16–21 km) per hour.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._21._5-3">[6]

Production plans and American interest
The Air Ministry had authorised mass production plans to be drawn up on 21 June 1941, by which time the Mosquito had become one of the world's fastest operational aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._21._5-4">[6] The Air Ministry ordered 19 photo-reconnaissance (PR) models and 176 fighters. A further 50 were unspecified; in July 1941, the Air Ministry confirmed these would be unarmed fast bombers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._21._5-5">[6] By the end of January 1942, contracts had been awarded for 1,378 Mosquitos of all variants, including 20 T.III trainers and 334 FB.VI bombers. Another 400 were to be built by de Havilland Canada.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._24._62-0">[56]

On 20 April 1941, W4050 was demonstrated to Lord Beaverbrook, the Minister of Aircraft Production. The Mosquito made a series of flights, including one rolling climb on one engine. Also present were US General Henry H. Arnold and his aide Major Elwood Quesada, who wrote "I ... recall the first time I saw the Mosquito as being impressed by its performance, which we were aware of. We were impressed by the appearance of the airplane that looks fast usually is fast, and the Mosquito was, by the standards of the time, an extremely well streamlined airplane, and it was highly regarded, highly respected."<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._19._42-2">[40] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-63">[57]

The trials set up future production plans between Britain, Australia and Canada. The Americans did not pursue their interest. It was thought the Lockheed P-38 Lightning could handle the same duties just as easily. Arnold felt the design was being overlooked, and urged the strategic personalities in the United States Army Air Force to learn from the design if they chose not to adopt it. Several days after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the USAAF then requested one airframe to evaluate on 12 December 1941, signifying that the USAAF realised that they had entered the war without a fast dual-purpose reconnaissance aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._20._61-2">[55]

Overview
The Mosquito was a fast, twin-engined aircraft with shoulder-mounted wings.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-64">[58] The most produced variant, designated the FB Mk VI (Fighter-bomber Mark 6), was powered by two Merlin Mk 23 or Mk 25 engines driving three-bladed de Havilland hydromatic propellers. The typical fixed armament for an FB Mk VI was four Browning .303 machine guns and four 20 mm Hispano cannon while the offensive load consisted of up to 2,000 pounds (910 kg) of bombs, or eight RP-3 unguided rockets.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-65">[59]

Construction
The oval-section fuselage was a frameless monocoque shell built in two halves being formed to shape by band clamps over a mahogany or concrete mould, each holding one half of the fuselage, split vertically. The shell halves were made of sheets of Ecuadorean balsawood sandwiched between sheets of Canadian birch, but in areas needing extra strength— such as along cut-outs— stronger woods replaced the balsa filler; the overall thickness of the birch and balsa sandwich skin was only 7/16 in (11.11mm). This sandwich skin was so stiff no internal reinforcement was necessary from the wing's rear spar to the tail bearing bulkhead.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-66">[60] The join was along the vertical centre line.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._7._67-0">[61] This split construction greatly aided the assembly of the internal equipment as it allowed the technicians easy access to the fuselage interior.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._15._68-0">[62] While the glue in the plywood skin dried, carpenters cut a sawtooth joint into the edges of the fuselage shells, while other workers installed the controls and cabling on the inside wall. When the glue completely dried, the two halves were glued and screwed together. The fuselage was strengthened internally by seven bulkheads made up of two plywood skins parted by spruce blocks, which formed the basis on each half for the outer shell.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-69">[63] Each bulkhead was a repeat of the spruce design for the fuselage halves; a balsa sheet sandwich between two plywood sheets/skins. Bulkhead number seven carried the fittings and loads for the tailplane and rudder, The type of glue originally used was Casein resin, which was later replaced by "Aerolite", a synthetic urea-formaldehyde, which was more durable.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-70">[64] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-73">[nb 8] Many other types of screws and flanges (made of various woods) also held the structure together.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._7._67-1">[61]

The fuselage construction joints were made from balsa wood and plywood strips with the spruce multi-ply being connected by a balsa V joint, along with the interior frame. The spruce would be reinforced by plywood strips at the point where the two halves joined to form the V-joint. Located on top of the joint the plywood formed the outer skin.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._15._68-1">[62] During the joining of the two halves ("boxing up"), two laminated wooden clamps would be used in the after portion of the fuselage to act as support.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._15._68-2">[62] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._8._74-0">[67] A covering of doped Madapolam (a fine plain woven cotton) fabric was stretched tightly over the shell and a coat of silver dope was applied, after which the exterior camouflage was applied.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-75">[68] The fuselage had a large ventral section cut-out, which was braced during construction, to allow it to be lowered onto the wing centre-section. Once the wing was secured the lower panels were replaced, and the bomb bay or armament doors fitted.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-76">[69] A closeup of the nose of a B Mk IV showing the clear nose and the bombsight: this view also shows the engine nacelles for the single-stage Merlin 23s and the undercarriage.The all-wood wing was built as a one-piece structure and was not divided into separate construction sections. It was made up of two main spars, spruce and plywood compression ribs, stringers, and a plywood covering. The outer plywood skin was covered and doped like the fuselage. The wing was installed into the roots by means of four large attachment points.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._7._67-2">[61] The engine radiators were fitted in the inner wing, just outboard of the fuselage on either side. These gave less drag.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._7._67-3">[61] The radiators themselves were split into three sections: an oil cooler section outboard, the middle section forming the coolant radiator and the inboard section serving the cabin heater.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._87._77-0">[70] The wing contained metal framed and skinned ailerons, but the flaps were made of wood and were hydraulically controlled. The nacelles were mostly wood, although, for strength, the engine mounts were all metal as were the undercarriage parts.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._7._67-4">[61] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._9._78-0">[71] Engine mounts of welded steel tube were added, along with simple landing gear oleos filled with rubber blocks. Wood was used to carry only in-plane loads, with metal fittings used for all triaxially loaded components such as landing gear, engine mounts, control surface mounting brackets, and the wing-to-fuselage junction.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-79">[72] The outer leading wing edge had to be brought 22 inches (56 cm) further forward to accommodate this design.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._87._77-1">[70] The main tail unit was all wood built. The control surfaces, the rudder and elevator were aluminium framed and fabric covered.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Batchelor_and_Lowe_2008.2C_p._7._67-5">[61] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._9._78-1">[71] The total weight of metal castings and forgings used in the aircraft was only 280 lb (130 kg).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-raaf_80-0">[73]

In November 1944, several crashes occurred in the Far East. At first, it was thought these were as a result of wing structure failures. The casein glue, it was said, cracked when exposed to extreme heat. This caused the upper surfaces to "lift" from the main spar. During the ensuing investigation, it was concluded that there were construction defects found at two plants, Hatfield and Coventry, where it was found that the "Standard of glueing...left much to be desired”.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_pp._15.E2.80.9316._81-0">[74] However, the main reason for the failures, the Air Ministry concluded on 1 January 1945, was the weather conditions in Asia, thereby endorsing the view of Major Hereward de Havilland, leading the investigation. To solve the problem, a sheet of plywood was set along the span of the wing to seal the entire length of the skin joint along the main spar and the casein glue was replaced by formaldehyde, which was better able to resist deterioration in high humidity conditions.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_pp._15.E2.80.9316._81-1">[74]

Systems
A view into the bomb bay showing the brick-red coloured twin fuel tanks fitted into the fuselage.The fuel systems allowed the Mosquito to have a good range and endurance, using up to nine fuel tanks. Two outer wing tanks each contained 58 imperial gallons (260 L) of fuel.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._11._.28FB_6_notes.29_82-0">[75] These were complemented by two inner wing fuel tanks, each containing 143 imperial gallons (650 L), located between the wing root and engine nacelle. In the central fuselage were twin 25 imperial gallons (110 L) fuel tanks mounted between bulkhead number two and three aft of the cockpit.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._22._83-0">[76] Both the inner wing, and fuselage tanks are listed as the "main tanks" and the total internal fuel load of 452 imp gal (2,050 l) was initially deemed appropriate for the type.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._11._.28FB_6_notes.29_82-1">[75] In addition, the FB Mk VI could have larger fuselage tanks, increasing the capacity to 63 imperial gallons (290 L). Drop tanks of 50 imperial gallons (230 L) or 100 imperial gallons (450 l) could be mounted under each wing, increasing the total fuel load to 615 or 715 imperial gallons (2,800 or 3,250 L) .<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._11._.28FB_6_notes.29_82-2">[75]

In order to reduce fuel vaporisation at high altitude, a feature needed in the photographic reconnaissance variants, the central and inner wing tanks were pressurised. The pressure venting cock located behind the pilot's seat controlled the pressure valve; as the altitude increased, the valve increased the volume applied by a pump. This system was extended to include field modifications of the fuel tank system.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-84">[77] The engine oil tanks were in the engine nacelles. Each nacelle contained a 15 imperial gallons (68 l) oil tank, including a 2.5 imp gal (11 l) air space. The oil tanks themselves had no separate coolant controlling systems. The coolant header tank was in the forward nacelle, behind the propeller. The remaining coolant systems were controlled by the coolant radiators shutters in the forward inner wing compartment, between the nacelle and the fuselage and behind the main engine cooling radiators which were fitted in the leading edge. Electric-pneumatic operated radiator shutters directed and controlled airflow through the ducts and into the coolant valves, to predetermined temperatures.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._14._.28FB_6_notes.29_85-0">[78]

Electrical power came from a 24 volt DC generator on the starboard (No. 2) engine and an alternator on the port engine which supplied AC power for radios.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bishop_1995_Appendix_1_86-0">[79] The radio shutters, superchargers, gun camera, bomb bay, bomb/rocket release and all the other crew controlled instruments were powered by a 24 volt battery.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._14._.28FB_6_notes.29_85-1">[78] The radio communication devices included VHF and HF communications, GEE navigation, and IFF and G.P devices. The electric generators also powered the fire extinguishers. Located on the starboard side of the cockpit, the switches would operate automatically in the event of a crash. In flight, a warning light would flash to indicate a fire, should the pilot not already be aware of it. In later models, presumably to save liquids, the fire extinguisher was changed to semi-automatic triggers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._44._.28FB_6_notes.29_87-0">[80] A preserved Mosquito B Mk XVI showing the air and oil coolant radiators in the leading edge of the wing. The intake for the two-stage Merlin's intercooler radiator is just behind the propeller blade, and the carburettor intake with ice guard is behind and belowThe design of the Mark VI allowed for a provisional long-range fuel tank to increase range for action over enemy territory, for the installation of bomb release equipment specific for depth charges for strikes against enemy shipping, or for the simultaneous use of rocket projectiles along with a 100 imperial gallons (450 L) drop tank under each wing supplementing the main fuel cells.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-88">[81] The FB.VI had a wingspan of 54 feet 2 inches (16.51 m), a length (over guns) of 41 feet 2 inches (12.55 m). It had a maximum speed of 378 miles per hour (608 km/h) at 13,200 feet (4,000 m). Maximum take-off weight was 22,300 pounds (10,100 kg) and the range of the aircraft was 1,120 miles (1,800 km) with a service ceiling of 26,000 feet (7,900 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-89">[82]

The main landing gear were housed in the nacelles behind the engines. These were raised and lowered hydraulically. The main landing gear shock absorbers were de Havilland manufactured and used a system of rubber in compression, rather than hydraulic oleos, with twin pneumatic brakes for each wheel.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bishop_1995_Appendix_1_86-1">[79] The Dunlop-Marstrand tailwheel was retractable.

Flight characteristics
The design was noted for having light and effective control surfaces which allowed for good manoeuvrability. It was noted that the rudder should not be used aggressively at high speeds and the poor aileron control at low speeds when landing and taking off was also a problem for inexperienced crews.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-90">[83] For flying at low speeds, the flaps had to be set at 15°, speed reduced to 201 miles per hour (323 km/h) and rpm set to 2,650. The speed could be reduced to an acceptable 150 miles per hour (240 km/h) for low speed flying.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._29._.28FB_6_notes.29_91-0">[84] For cruising the maximum speed for obtaining maximum range was 200 miles per hour (320 km/h) at 17,000 lb (7,700 kg) weight.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._29._.28FB_6_notes.29_91-1">[84]

The Mosquito had a low stall speed of 121 miles per hour (195 km/h) with undercarriage and flaps raised. When both were lowered, the stall speed decreased to 100–120 miles per hour (160–190 km/h). Stall speed at normal approach angle and conditions was 100–109 miles per hour (160–175 km/h). Warning of the stall was given by buffeting and would occur 12 miles per hour (19 km/h) before stall was reached. The conditions and impact of the stall were not severe. The wing did not drop unless the control column was pulled back. The nose drooped gently and recovery was easy.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Air_Ministry_1945.2C_p._29._.28FB_6_notes.29_91-2">[84]

Operational history
Bombing of the Gestapo-headquarters in the Shellhus, Copenhagen, Denmark in March 1945. A Mosquito pulling away from its bombing run is visible on the extreme left, centreMain article: de Havilland Mosquito operational historyThe de Havilland Mosquito operated in many roles during the Second World War, being tasked to perform medium bomber, reconnaissance, tactical strike, anti-submarine warfare and shipping attack and night fighter duties, both defensive and offensive, until the end of the war.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-92">[85] The Mosquito was first announced publicly on 26 September 1942 after the Oslo Mosquito raid of 25 September. The Mosquito flew its last official European war mission on 21 May 1945, when Mosquitos of 143 Squadron and 248 Squadron RAF were ordered to continue to hunt German submarines that might be tempted to continue the fight; instead of submarines all the Mosquitos encountered were passive E-boats.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-93">[86]

Mosquitos were widely used by the RAF Pathfinder Force, marking targets for the main night-time strategic bombing force, as well as flying "nuisance raids" in which Mosquitos often dropped 4,000 lb "Cookies". Despite an initially high loss rate, the Mosquito ended the war with the lowest losses of any aircraft in RAF Bomber Command service. Post war, the RAF found that when finally applied to bombing, in terms of useful damage done, the Mosquito had proved 4.95 times cheaper than the Lancaster.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-94">[87] In April 1943, in response to "political humiliation" caused by the Mosquito, Hermann Göring ordered the formation of special Luftwaffe units (Jagdgeschwader 25, commanded by Oberstleutnant Herbert Ihlefeld and Jagdgeschwader 50, under Major Hermann Graf) to combat the Mosquito attacks, though these units, which were "little more than glorified squadrons", were not very successful against the elusive RAF aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Caldwell_and_Muller_2007.2C_p._79._95-0">[88]

Some of the most successful RAF pilots flew the Mosquito. Bob Braham claimed around a third of his 29 kills in a Mosquito, flying mostly daytime operations, while on night fighters Wing Commander Branse Burbridge claimed 21 kills, and Wing Commander John Cunningham claimed 19 of his 20 victories at night on Mosquitos.

One Mosquito is listed as belonging to German secret operations unit Kampfgeschwader 200, which tested, evaluated and sometimes clandestinely operated captured enemy aircraft during the war. The aircraft was listed on the order of battle of Versuchsverband OKL's, 2 Staffel, Stab Gruppe on 10 November and 31 December 1944. However, on both lists, the Mosquito is listed as unserviceable.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-96">[89]

Göring's comments
The Mosquito famously annoyed the Commander in Chief of the Luftwaffe, Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, when, on 20 January 1943, the 10th anniversary of the Nazis' seizure of power, a Mosquito attack knocked out the main Berlin broadcasting station, putting his speech off air. Göring complained about the high speed of the aircraft and its wooden structure, built by a nation he considered to have large metal reserves, while Germany had shortages of such materials and could not produce such a design.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-97">[90] In 1940 I could at least fly as far as Glasgow in most of my aircraft, but not now! It makes me furious when I see the Mosquito. I turn green and yellow with envy. The British, who can afford aluminium better than we can, knock together a beautiful wooden aircraft that every piano factory over there is building, and they give it a speed which they have now increased yet again. What do you make of that? There is nothing the British do not have. They have the geniuses and we have the nincompoops. After the war is over I'm going to buy a British radio set - then at least I'll own something that has always worked.

<p style="text-align: right;">— Hermann Göring, 1943.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-98">[91] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-99">[92]

Variants
Up until the end of 1942, the RAF always used Roman numerals for mark numbers; 1943-1948 was a transition period during which new aircraft entering service were given Arabic numerals for mark numbers, but older aircraft retained their Roman numerals. From 1948 onwards, Arabic numerals were used exclusively.

Prototypes
Three prototypes were built, each with a different configuration. The first to fly was W4050 on 25 November 1940, followed by the fighter W4052 on 15 May 1941 and the photo-reconnaissance prototype W4051 on 10 June 1941. W4051 later flew operationally with 1 Photographic Reconnaissance Unit (1 PRU).

Photo-reconnaissance
A 1943 RAF photo-reconnaissance picture of Test Stand VII at the Peenemünde Army Research Centre, taken by a Mosquito. Horizontally lying V2 rockets are labelled "B" and "C"Ten Mosquito PR Mk Is were built, with four of them being "long range" versions equipped with a 151 imperial gallons (690 L) overload fuel tank in the fuselage.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thirsk_2006.2C_p._269_54-1">[49] The contract called for ten of the PR Mk I airframes to be converted to B Mk IV Series 1s.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-100">[93] All of the PR Mk Is, and the B Mk IV Series 1s, had the original short engine nacelles and short span (19 ft 5.5 in) tailplanes. Their engine cowlings incorporated the original pattern of integrated exhaust manifolds which, after a relatively brief flight time, had a troublesome habit of burning and blistering the cowling panels.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-101">[94] The first operational sortie by a Mosquito was made by a PR Mk I, W4055, on 17 September 1941; during this sortie the unarmed Mosquito PR.I evaded three Messerschmitt Bf 109s at 23,000 feet (7,000 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._27._102-0">[95] Powered by two Merlin 21s, the PR Mk I had a maximum speed of 382 miles per hour (615 km/h), a cruise speed of 255 miles per hour (410 km/h), a ceiling of 35,000 feet (11,000 m), a range of 2,180 nautical miles (4,040 km), and a climb rate of 2,850 feet (870 m) per minute.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._25._103-0">[96]

Over 30 Mosquito B Mk IV bombers were converted into the PR Mk IV photo-reconnaissance aircraft.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-104">[97] The first operational flight by a PR Mk IV was made by DK284 in April 1942.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._164._105-0">[98]

The Mosquito PR Mk VIII, built as a stopgap pending the introduction of the refined PR Mk IX, was the next photo-reconnaissance version. The five VIIIs were converted from B Mk IVs and became the first operational Mosquito version to be powered by two-stage, two-speed supercharged engines, using 1,565 hp (1,167 kW) Rolls-Royce Merlin 61 engines in place of Merlin 21/22s. The first PR Mk VIII, DK324 first flew on 20 October 1942.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thir272_106-0">[99] The PR Mk VIII had a maximum speed of 436 mph (700 km/h), a cruise speed of 258 mph (415 km/h), a ceiling of 38,000 ft (11,580 m), a range of 2,550 nm (4,100 km), and a climb rate of 2,500 ft per minute (760 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._25._103-1">[96]

The Mosquito PR Mk IX, 90 of which were built, was the first Mosquito variant with two-stage, two-speed engines to be produced in quantity; the first of these, LR405, first flew in April 1943.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thir272_106-1">[99] The PR Mk IX was based on the Mosquito B Mk IX bomber and was powered by two 1,680 hp (1,253 kW) Merlin 72/73 or 76/77 engines. It could carry either two 50 imperial gallons (230 L), two 100 imperial gallons (450 L) or two 200 imperial gallons (910 L) droppable fuel tanks.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._164._105-1">[98]

The Mosquito PR Mk XVI had a pressurised cockpit and, like the Mk IX, was powered by two Rolls-Royce Merlin 72/73 or 76/77 piston engines. This version was equipped with three overload fuel tanks, totalling 760 imperial gallons (3,500 L) in the bomb bay, and could also carry two 50 imperial gallons (230 L) or 100 imperial gallons (450 L) drop tanks.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-107">[100] A total of 435 of the PR Mk XVI were built.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._164._105-2">[98] The PR Mk XVI had a maximum speed of 415 mph (668 km/h), a cruise speed of 250 mph (402 km/h), ceiling of 38,500 ft (11,730 m), a range of 2,450 nm (3,942 km), and a climb rate of 2,900 feet per minute (884 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._25._103-2">[96]

The Mosquito PR Mk 32 was a long-range, high-altitude, pressurised photo-reconnaissance version. It was powered by a pair of two-stage supercharged 1,960 hp (1,260 kW) Rolls-Royce Merlin 113 and Merlin 114 piston engines, the Merlin 113 on the starboard side and the Merlin 114 on the port. First flown in August 1944, only five were built and all were conversions from PR.XVIs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-0">[101]

The Mosquito PR Mk 34 and PR Mk 34A was a very long-range unarmed high altitude photo-reconnaissance version. The fuel tank and cockpit protection armour were removed. Additional fuel was carried in a bulged bomb bay: 1,192 gallons which was the equivalent of 5,419 miles (8,721 km). A further two 200 gallon (910 litre) drop tanks under the outer wings gave a range of 3,600 miles (5,800 km) cruising at 300 mph (480 km/h). Powered by two 1,690 hp (1,259 kW) Merlin 114s first used in the PR.32. The port Merlin 114 drove a Marshal cabin supercharger. A total of 181 were built, including 50 built by Percival Aircraft Company at Luton.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-1">[101] The PR.34's maximum speed (TAS) was 335 mph (539 km/h) at sea level, 405 mph (652 km/h) at 17,000 ft (5,200 m) and 425 mph (684 km/h) at 30,000 ft (9,100 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-The_latest_Mosquitoes._109-0">[102] All PR.34s were installed with four split F52 vertical cameras, two forward, two aft of the fuselage tank and one F24 oblique camera. Sometimes a K-17 camera was used for air surveys. In August 1945, the PR.34A was the final photo-reconnaissance variant with one Merlin 113A and 114A each delivering 1,710 hp (1,274 kW).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._166._110-0">[103]

Colonel Roy M. Stanley II, USAF (RET) wrote: "I consider the Mosquito the best photo-reconnaissance aircraft of the war".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-V_Weapons_Hunt.2C_p35_111-0">[104]

Bombers
Mosquito B Mk IV Series 2, DK338, built in September 1942 and delivered to 105 Squadron, becoming GB-O.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-112">[105] IWM CollectionOn 21 June 1941, the Air Ministry ordered that the last 10 Mosquitoes, ordered as photo-reconnaissance aircraft, should be converted to bombers. These 10 aircraft were part of the original 1 March 1940 production order and became the B Mk IV Series 1. W4052 was to be the prototype and flew for the first time on 8 September 1941.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_pp._22.E2.80.9323._113-0">[106]

The bomber prototype led to the B Mk IV, of which 273 were built: apart from the 10 Series 1s, all of the rest were built as Series 2s with extended nacelles, revised exhaust manifolds, with integrated flame dampers, and larger tailplanes.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._15._114-0">[107] Series 2 bombers also differed from the Series 1 in having a larger bomb bay to increase the payload to four 500 lb (230 kg) bombs, instead of the four 250 lb (115 kg) bombs of Series 1. This was made possible by shortening the tail of the 500 lb (230 kg) bomb so that these four larger weapons could be carried (or a 2,000 lb (920;kg) total load).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._15._114-1">[107] The B Mk IV entered service in May 1942 with 105 Squadron.

In April 1943, a decision was made to convert a B Mk IV to carry a 4,000 lb (1,812 kg), thin cased High explosive bomb (nicknamed "Cookie"). The conversion, including modified bomb bay suspension arrangements, bulged bomb bay doors and fairings, was relatively straight forward and 54 B.IVs were subsequently modified: these were then distributed to squadrons of RAF Bomber Command's Light Night Striking Force.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._15._114-2">[107] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-115">[108] 27 B Mk IVs were later converted for special operations with the Highball anti-shipping weapon, and were used by 618 Squadron, which was formed in April 1943, specifically to use this weapon.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-116">[109] A B Mk IV, DK290 was initially used a trials aircraft for the bomb, followed by DZ471,530 and 533.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-117">[110] The B Mk IV had a maximum speed of 380 mph (611 km/h), a cruising speed of 265 mph (426 km/h), ceiling of 34,000 ft (10,360 m), a range of 2,040 nm (3,280 km), and a climb rate of 2,500 ft per minute (762 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._25._103-3">[96]

Other bomber variants of the Mosquito included the Merlin 21 powered B Mk V high-altitude version. Trials with this configuration were made with W4057 which had the wings strengthened and an addition of two fuel tanks. Alternatively, two 500 lb (227 kg) bombs. This design was not produced in Britain, but formed the basic design of the Canadian-built B.VII. Only W4057 was built in prototype form.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._16._118-0">[111] The Merlin 31 powered B Mk VII was built by de Havilland Canada. It was based on the B.V and first flown on 24 September 1942. It only saw service in Canada and only 25 were built. Six were handed over to the United States Army Air Force.

B Mk IX (54 built) was powered by either the Merlin 72,73, 76 or 77. The two-stage Merlin variant was based on the PR.IX. The prototype DK 324 was converted from a PR.VIII and first flew on 24 March 1943.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._17._119-0">[112] In October 1943 it was decided that all B Mk IVs and all B Mk IXs then in service would be converted to carry the 4,000 lb (1,812 kg) "Cookie", and all B Mk IXs built after that date had provision included to able to be converted to carry the weapon.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-S.26P306_120-0">[113] The B Mk IX had a maximum speed of 408 mph (656 km/h), a cruising speed of 250 mph (402 km/h), ceiling of 36,000 ft (10,970 m), a range of 2,450 nm (3,940 km), and a climb rate of 2,850 feet per minute (869 m). The IX could carry a maximum load of 2-4,000 lb (910-1,810 kg) of bombs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._25._103-4">[96] A Mosquito B Mk IX holds the record for the most combat operations flown by an Allied bomber in the Second World War. LR503, known as "F for Freddie" (from its squadron code letters, GB*F), first served with No. 109 and subsequently, No. 105 RAF squadrons. It flew 213 sorties during the war, only to crash at Calgary airport during the Eighth Victory Loan Bond Drive on 10 May 1945, two days after Victory in Europe Day, killing both the pilot, Flt. Lt. Maurice Briggs, DSO, DFC, DFM and navigator Fl. Off. John Baker, DFC and Bar.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-121">[114]

The B Mk XVI was powered by the same variations as the B.IX. All B Mk XVIs were capable of being converted to carry the 4,000 lb (1,812 kg) "Cookie".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-S.26P306_120-1">[113] The two-stage powerplants were added along with a pressurised cabin. DZ540 first flew on 1 January 1944. The prototype was converted from a IV (402 built). The next variant, the B Mk XX, was powered by Packard Merlins 31 and 33s. It was the Canadian version of the IV. Altogether, 245 were built.

The B.35 was powered by Merlin 113 and 114As. Some were converted to TT.35s (Target Tugs) and others were used as PR.35s (photo-reconnaissance).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Jackson_2003.2C_p._17._119-1">[112] The B Mk XVI had a maximum speed of 408 mph (656 km/h), a cruising speed of 245 mph (394 km/h), ceiling of 37,000 ft (11,280 m), a range of 1,485 nm (2,390 km), and a climb rate of 2,800 ft per minute (853 m). The type could carry 4,000 lb (1,810 kg) of bombs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._25._103-5">[96] The B.35 had a maximum speed of 422 mph (679 km/h), a cruising speed of 276 mph (444 km/h), ceiling of 42,000 ft (12,800 m), a range of 1,750 nm (2,820 km), and a climb rate of 2,700 ft per minute (823 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._26._122-0">[115]

Fighters
Developed during 1940, the first prototype of the Mosquito F Mk II was completed on 15 May 1941. These Mosquitos were fitted with four 20 mm (.79 in) Hispano cannon in the fuselage belly and four .303 in (7.7 mm) Browning machine guns mounted in the nose. On production Mk IIs the machine guns and ammunition tanks were accessed via two centrally hinged, sideways opening doors in the upper nose section. To arm and service the cannon the bomb bay doors were replaced by manually operated bay doors: the F and NF Mk IIs could not carry bombs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Thirsk_2006.2C_pp._125.2C_134_55-1">[50] The type was also fitted with a gun camera in a compartment above the machine guns in the nose and was fitted with exhaust flame dampers to reduce the glare from the Merlin XXs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-123">[116]

In August 1942 Britain experienced several incursions of high-altitude Luftwaffe bombers, including the Junkers Ju-86P. As a result of these raids, starting in September 1942, five Mosquito B Mk IV bombers were quickly converted into F Mk XV high-altitude, pressurised fighters, powered by two-stage Merlin 73s and 77s fitted with four-bladed propellers.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-124">[117]

The first of these conversions was MP469, which was wheeled into the experimental shop on 7 September and first flew on 14 September. The bomber nose forward of the cockpit was cut off and a standard fighter nose, complete with four .303 Brownings, grafted on in its place. The pressurised crew cabin retained the bomber's canopy structure, with a vee-shaped, two-piece windscreen, while the bomber's control wheel was replaced by the fighter's control stick. Extended, pointed, wingtips increased the wingspan to 59 feet (18 m). In an effort to lighten the airframe all armour plating was removed, all bullet proof material was taken off the fuel and oil tanks, and the outer wing and fuselage tanks were removed, leaving the inner wing tanks with a total capacity of 287 imperial gallons (1,300 L). Other ancillary equipment was removed and smaller diameter main wheels were fitted after the first few flights. At a loaded weight of 16,200 lb (7,300 kg) the Mk XV was 2,300 lb (1,000 kg) lighter than a standard Mk II, and reached an altitude of 45,000 feet (14,000 m). Four more B Mk IVs were converted into F Mk XVs, and, in late 1942, were further modified to become NF MK XVs.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-125">[118]

All fighters and fighter bombers, apart from the F Mk XV, featured a modified canopy structure incorporating a flat, single piece armoured windscreen, and the crew entry/exit door was moved from the bottom of the forward fuselage to the right side of the nose, just forward of the wing leading edge.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-126">[119] The pilot was provided with a fighter-style control stick rather than a wheel.

Night fighters
Mosquito NF Mk II W4092 of 157 Squadron, January 1944. Just visible is part of the aerial array for the A.I Mk IV near the wingtip.At the end of 1940, the Air Staff's preferred night fighter design was the Gloster F.18/40 (derived from their F.9/37). However, although in agreement as to the quality of Gloster's design, the Ministry of Aircraft Production was concerned that Gloster would not be able to work on the F.18/40 and also the jet fighter design, considered the greater priority. Accordingly in mid-1941, the Air Staff and MAP agreed that the Gloster aircraft would be dropped and the Mosquito considered for the night fighter requirement instead.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-127">[120]

The first production night fighter Mosquitos were designated NF Mk II. A total of 466 were built with the first entering service with No. 157 Squadron in January 1942, replacing the Douglas Havoc. These aircraft were similar to the F Mk II, but were fitted with the AI Mk IV metric wavelength radar. The herring-bone transmitting antenna was mounted on the nose and the dipole receiving antennae were carried under the outer wings.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-128">[121] A number of NF IIs had their radar equipment removed and additional fuel tanks installed in the bay behind the cannon for use as night intruders. These aircraft, designated NF II (Special) were first used by 23 Squadron in operations over Europe in 1942.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-129">[122] 23 Squadron was then deployed to Malta on 20 December 1942, and operated against targets in Italy.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-130">[123]

Ninety-seven NF Mk IIs were upgraded with centimetric AI Mk VIII radar and these were designated NF Mk XII. The NF Mk XIII, of which 270 were built, was the production equivalent of the Mk XII conversions. The centimetric radar sets were mounted in a solid "thimble" (Mk XII / XIII) or universal "bull nose" (Mk XVII / XIX) radome, which required the machine guns to be dispensed with. NF Mk XIII of 256 Squadron, with the "bull nose", caught in the beam of a Chance light on the main runway at Foggia, Italy, before taking off on a night intruder sortie.Four F Mk XVs were converted to the NF Mk XV. These were fitted with AI Mk VIII in a "thimble" radome, and the .303 Brownings were moved into a gun pack fitted under the forward fuselage.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-131">[124]

NF Mk XVII was the designation for 99 NF Mk II conversions, with single-stage Merlin 21, 22, or 23 engines, but British AI.X (US SCR-720) radar.

The NF Mk XIX was an improved version of the NF XIII. It could be fitted with American or British AI radars; 220 were built.

The NF Mk 30 was the final wartime variant and was a high-altitude version, powered by two 1,710 hp (1,275 kW) Roll-Royce Merlin 76s. The NF Mk 30 had a maximum speed of 424 mph (682 km/h) at 26,500 ft (8,100 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-132">[125] It also carried early electronic countermeasuresequipment. 526 were built. Swedish Air Force NF.XIX operational in 1949Other Mosquito night fighter variants which were planned for but never built, included the NF Mk X and NF Mk XIV (the latter based on the NF Mk XIII), both of which were to have two-stage Merlins. The NF Mk 31 was a variant of the NF Mk 30, but powered by Packard Merlins.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-133">[126]

Mosquito night intruders of 100 Group, Bomber Command, were also fitted with a device called "Serrate" to allow them to track down German night fighters from their Lichtenstein B/C and SN-2 radar emissions, as well as a device named "Perfectos" that tracked German IFF signals.

After the war, two more night fighter versions were developed: The NF Mk 36 was similar to the Mosquito NF Mk 30, but fitted with the American-built AI.Mk X radar. Powered by two 1,690 hp (1,260 kW) Roll-Royce Merlin 113/114 piston engines; 266 built. Max level speeds (TAS) with flame dampers fitted were 305 mph (491 km/h) at sea level, 380 mph (610 km/h) at 17,000 ft (5,200 m), and 405 mph (652 km/h) at 30,000 ft (9,100 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-The_latest_Mosquitoes._109-1">[102]

The NF Mk 38, 101 of which were built, was also similar to the Mosquito NF Mk 30, but fitted with the British-built AI Mk IX radar. This variant suffered from stability problems and did not enter RAF service: 60 were eventually sold to Yugoslavia.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-134">[127] According to the Pilot's Notes and Air Ministry 'Special Flying Instruction TF/487', which posted limits on the Mosquito's maximum speeds, the NF Mk 38 had a VNE of 370 knots (425 mph), without under wing stores, and within the altitude range of sea level to 10,000 ft (3,000 m). However, from 10,000 to 15,000 ft (4,600 m) the maximum speed was 348 knots (400 mph). As the height increased other recorded speeds were; 15,000 to 20,000 ft (6,100 m) 320 knots (368 mph); 20,000 to 25,000 ft (7,600 m), 295 knots (339 mph); 25,000 to 30,000 ft (9,100 m), 260 knots (299 mph); 30,000 to 35,000 ft (11,000 m), 235 knots (270 mph). With two added 100 gallon fuel tanks this performance fell; between sea level and 15,000 feet 330 knots (379 mph); between 15,000 to 20,000 ft (6,100 m) 320 knots (368 mph); 20,000 to 25,000 ft (7,600 m), 295 knots (339 mph); 25,000 to 30,000 ft (9,100 m), 260 knots (299 mph); 30,000 to 35,000 ft (11,000 m), 235 knots (270 mph). Little difference was noted above 15,000 ft (4,600 m).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-135">[128]

Fighter-bombers
Guns and bombs of an RAAF FB Mk VIThe FB Mk VI, which first flew on 1 June 1942, was powered by two 1,460 hp (1,088 kW) Merlin 21s or 1,635 hp (1,218 kW) Merlin 25s, and introduced a re-stressed and reinforced "basic" wing structure capable of carrying single 250 lb (115 kg) or 500 lb (230 kg) bombs on racks housed in streamlined fairings under each wing, or up to eight RP-3 25lb or 60 lb rockets. In addition fuel lines were added to the wings to enable single 50 imperial gallons (230 l) or 100 imperial gallons (450 l) drop tanks to be carried under each wing.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._164._105-3">[98] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Stre177_136-0">[129] The usual fixed armament was four 20mm Hispano Mk.II cannon and four .303 (7.7 mm) Browning machine guns, while two 250 lb (115 kg) or 500 lb (230 kg) bombs could be carried in the bomb bay.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-137">[nb 9] Unlike the F Mk II, the ventral bay doors were split into two pairs, with the forward pair being used to access the cannon, while the rear pair acted as bomb bay doors.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-138">[130] The maximum fuel load capable of being carried was 719.5 imperial gallons (3,271 l) distributed between 453 imperial gallons (2,060 l) internal fuel tanks, plus two overload tanks, each of 66.5 imperial gallons (302 l) capacity, which could be fitted in the bomb bay, and two 100 imperial gallons (450 l) drop tanks.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Stre177_136-2">[129] All-out level speed is often given as 368 mph (592 km/h), however this speed applies to aircraft fitted with saxophone exhausts. The test aircraft (HJ679) fitted with stub exhausts was found to be performing below expectations. It was returned to de Havilland at Hatfield where it was serviced. Its top speed was then tested and found to be 384 mph (618 km/h), in line with expectations.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-139">[131] 2,298 FB Mk VIs were built, nearly one-third of Mosquito production.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._164._105-4">[98] 18 built by Airspeed Ltd were eventually modified to become FB.XVIIIs. Two were converted to TR.33 carrier-borne, maritime strike prototypes.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._164._105-5">[98] An FB Mk VI NS898 of 613 Squadron, June 1944, shows full invasion stripes and is well weathered through operational use.The FB Mk VI proved capable of holding its own with single-engine fighter aircraft. For example, on 15 January 1945 Mosquito FB Mk VIs of 143 Squadron were engaged by 30 Focke-Wulf Fw 190s from Jagdgeschwader 5: five Mosquitos were lost but five Fw 190s were shot down in return, and an armed trawler and two merchant ships were sunk.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-140">[132]

Another fighter-bomber variant was the Mosquito FB Mk XVIII (sometimes known as the Tsetse) of which 18 were purpose built and 27 converted from Mk VIs. The Mk XVIII was armed with a Molins "6-pounder Class M" cannon: this was a modified QF 6-pounder (57 mm) anti-tank gun fitted with an auto-loader to allow both semi- or fully automatic fire.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-141">[nb 10] 25 rounds were carried, with the entire installation weighing 1,580 lb (716 kg).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-3">[101] In addition, 900 lb (408 kg)of armour was added within the engine cowlings, around the nose and under the cockpit floor to protect the engines and crew from the heavily armed U-boats, which were intended to be the primary target of the Mk XVIII.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-142">[133] Two or four .303 (7.7 mm) Browning machine guns were retained in the nose and were used to "sight" the main weapon onto the target.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-4">[101] Mosquito FB Mk XVIII NT225 of 248 Squadron Special Detachment showing the 57mm Molins gun and the streamlined blister used to make room for the automatic loading mechanism.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-144">[nb 11] The Air Ministry initially suspected that this variant would not work, but tests proved otherwise. Although the gun provided the Mosquito with yet more anti-shipping firepower for use against U-boats, it required a steady approach-run to aim and fire the gun, thus making it vulnerable to anti aircraft fire. The gun had a muzzle velocity of 2,950 ft/s (900 m/s)<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-5">[101] and an excellent range of some 1,800 - 1,500 yards (1,650 - 1,370 m). It was sensitive to sidewards movement and an attack required a dive from 5,000 ft (1,520 m) at a 30° angle with the turn and bank indicator on centre. A move during the dive could jam the cannon.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-145">[135] The prototype HJ732 was converted from a FB.VI and was first flown on 8 June 1943.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-6">[101]

The effect of the new weapon was demonstrated on 10 March 1944 when Mk XVIIIs from 248 Squadron (escorted by four Mk VIs) engaged a German convoy of one U-boat and four destroyers, protected by 10 Ju 88s. Three of the Ju 88s were shot down. Pilot Tony Phillips destroyed one Ju 88 with four shells, one of which tore an engine off the Ju 88. The U-boat was damaged. On 25 March, U-976 was sunk by Molins-equipped Mosquitos.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-146">[136] On 10 June, U-821 was abandoned in the face of intense air attack from No. 248 Squadron, and was later sunk by a Liberator of No. 206 Squadron.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-147">[137] On 5 April 1945 Mosquitos with Molins again demonstrated their value and attacked five German surface ships in the Kattegat and set all of them on fire and sinking.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._115._148-0">[138] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-149">[139] A Sperrbrecher (pathfinder ship) was lost with all hands, with some 200 bodies being recovered by Swedish vessels.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._115._148-1">[138] Some 900 German soldiers died in total.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._115._148-2">[138] On 9 April German U-boats  U-804 ,  U-843  and  U-1065  were spotted in formation heading for Norway. All were sunk.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._115._148-3">[138] <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-150">[140] U-251 and U-2359 followed on 19 April and 2 May 1945.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-151">[141]

Despite the preference for rockets, a further development of the idea was carried out using the even larger 32-pounder, a gun based on the QF 3.7 inch AA gun designed for tank use, the airborne version using a novel form of muzzle brake. Developed to prove the feasibility of using such a large weapon in the Mosquito, this installation was not completed until after the war when it was flown and fired in a single aircraft without problems before being scrapped.

The FB Mk 26 and FB Mk 40, based on the Mk VI, were built in Canada and Australia respectively, and were powered by Packard Merlins. The FB.26 was the Canadian variant version of the VI and improved from the FB.21 using 1,620 hp (1,207 kW) single stage Packard Merlin 225s. Some 300 were built and another 37 converted to T.29 standard.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._165._108-7">[101] 212 FB.40s were again versions of the FB.VI built by de Havilland Australia. Six were converted to PR.40; 28 to PR.41s one to FB.42 and 22 to T.43s tactical assault aircraft. Most were powered by Packard-built Merlin 31 or 33s.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._166._110-1">[103]

Trainers
The Mosquito was also built as the Mosquito T Mk III two-seat trainer. This version, powered by two Rolls-Royce Merlin 21s, was unarmed and had a modified cockpit fitted with dual control arrangements. A total of 348 of the T Mk III were built for the RAF and Fleet Air Arm. de Havilland Australia built 11 T Mk 43 trainers, similar to the Mk III.

Torpedo-bombers
To meet specification N.15/44 for a navalised Mosquito for Royal Navy use as a torpedo bomber, de Havilland produced a carrier-borne variant. A Mosquito FB.VI was modified as a prototype designated Sea Mosquito TR Mk 33 with folding wings, arrester hook, thimble nose radome, Merlin 25 engines with four-bladed propellers and a new oleo-pneumatic landing gear rather than the standard rubber-in-compression gear. An order for 100 TR.33s was placed although only 50 were built at Leavesden. Armament was four 20mm cannon, two 500 lb bombs in the bomb bay, (another two could be fitted under the wings) eight 60 lb rockets (four under each wing) and a standard torpedo under the fuselage. The first production TR.33 flew on 10 November 1945. This series was followed by six Sea Mosquito TR Mk 37s, which differed in having ASV Mk XIII radar instead of the TR.33's AN/APS-6.

Target tugs
The Royal Navy also operated the Mosquito TT Mk 39 for target towing. A number of B Mk XVIs bombers were converted into TT Mk 39 target tug aircraft. The RAF's target tug version was the Mosquito TT Mk 35 which were the last aircraft to remain in operational service, finally being retired in 1956. Two ex-RAF FB.6s were converted to TT.6 standard at Manchester (Ringway) Airport by Fairey Aviation in 1953–1954, being delivered to the Belgian Air Force for use as towing aircraft from the Sylt firing ranges.

Canadian-built
B Mk XX, the Canadian version of B Mk IV. One of the 40 USAAF F-8sA total of 1,133<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-152">[142] (to 1945) Mosquitos were built by De Havilland Canada at Downsview Airfield in Downsview Ontario (now Downsview Park in Toronto Ontario).
 * Mosquito B Mk VII : Canadian version based on the Mosquito B Mk V bomber aircraft. Powered by two 1,418 hp (1,057 kW) Packard Merlin 31 piston engines; 25 built.
 * Mosquito B Mk XX : Canadian version of the Mosquito B Mk IV bomber aircraft; 145 built, of which 40 were converted into F-8 photo-reconnaissance aircraft for the USAAF.
 * Mosquito FB Mk 21 : Canadian version of the Mosquito FB Mk VI fighter-bomber aircraft. Powered by two 1,460 hp (1,089 kW) Rolls-Royce Merlin 31 piston engines, three built.
 * Mosquito T Mk 22 : Canadian version of the Mosquito T Mk III training aircraft.
 * Mosquito B Mk 23 : Unused designation for a bomber variant.
 * Mosquito FB Mk 24 : Canadian fighter-bomber version. Powered by two 1,620 hp (1,208 kW) Rolls-Royce Merlin 301 piston engines; two built.
 * Mosquito B Mk 25 : Improved version of the Mosquito B Mk XX Bomber aircraft. Powered by two 1,620 hp (1,208 kW) Packard Merlin 225 piston engines; 400 built.
 * Mosquito FB Mk 26 : Improved version of the Mosquito FB Mk 21 fighter-bomber aircraft. Powered by two 1,620 hp (1,208 kW) Packard Merlin 225 piston engines; 338 built.
 * Mosquito T Mk 27 : Canadian-built training aircraft.
 * Mosquito T Mk 29 : A number of FB Mk 26 fighters were converted into T Mk 29 trainers.

Australian-built
Mosquito FB Mk 40 A52-50.*Mosquito FB Mk 40 : Two-seat fighter-bomber version for the RAAF. Powered by two 1,460 hp (1,089 kW) Roll-Royce Merlin 31 piston engines. A total of 178 built in Australia.
 * Mosquito PR Mk 40 : This designation was given to six FB Mk 40s, which were converted into photo-reconnaissance aircraft.
 * Mosquito FB Mk 41 : Two-seat fighter-bomber version for the RAAF. A total of 11 were built in Australia.
 * Mosquito PR Mk 41 : Two-seat photo-survey version for the RAAF. A total of 17 were built in Australia.
 * Mosquito FB Mk 42 : Two-seat fighter-bomber version. Powered by two Rolls-Royce Merlin 69 piston engines. One FB Mk 40 aircraft was converted into a Mosquito FB Mk 42.
 * Mosquito T Mk 43 : Two-seat training version for the RAAF. A total of 11 FB Mk 40s were converted into Mosquito T Mk 43s.

Highball
A number of Mosquito IVs were modified by Vickers-Armstrongs to carry Highball "bouncing bombs" and were allocated Vickers Type numbers:
 * Type 463 - Prototype Highball conversion of Mosquito IV DZ741.
 * Type 465 - Conversion of 33 Mosquito IVs to carry Highball.

Details
B Mk IV DK336 of 105 Squadron being prepared for Operation Oyster a raid on the Philips electrical works at Eindhoven on 5 December 1942.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-153">[143] In England, fuselage shells were mainly made by the furniture companies Ronson, E. Gomme, Parker Knoll and Styles & Mealing. The specialized wood veneer used in the construction of the Mosquito was made by Roddis Manufacturing in Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States. Hamilton Roddis had teams of dextrous young women ironing the (unusually thin) strong wood veneer product before shipping to the UK.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Cole_154-0">[144] Wing spars were made by J.B. Heath and Dancer & Hearne. Many of the other parts, including flaps, flap shrouds, fins, leading edge assemblies and bomb doors were also produced in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, which was well suited to these tasks because of a well-established furniture manufacturing industry. Dancer & Hearne processed much of the wood from start to finish, receiving timber and transforming it into finished wing spars at their High Wycombe factory.

About 5,000 of the 7,781 Mosquitos made contained parts made in High Wycombe.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Cole_154-1">[144] In Canada, fuselages were built in the Oshawa, Ontario plant of General Motors of Canada Limited. These were shipped to De Havilland Canada in Toronto for mating to fuselages and completion. As a secondary manufacturer, de Havilland Australia started construction in Sydney. These production lines added 1,076 from Canada and 212 from Australia.

Total Mosquito production was 7,781 of which 6,710 were built during the war. The ferry operation of the Mosquito from Canada to the war front was problematic, as a small fraction of the aircraft would mysteriously disappear over the mid-Atlantic. The theory of "auto-explosion" was offered, and, although a concentrated effort at de Havilland Canada to address production problems with engine and oil systems reduced the number of aircraft lost, it was unclear as to the actual cause of the losses. The company introduced an additional five hours flight testing to "clear" production aircraft before the ferry flight. By the end of the war, nearly 500 Mosquito bombers and fighter-bombers had been delivered successfully by the Canadian operation.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-155">[145]

In total, both during the war and post war, de Havilland exported 46 FB.VIs and 29 PR.XVIs to Australia, two FB.VI and 18 NF.30s to Belgium, approximately 205 FB.26, T.29 and T.27s to Nationalist China, 19 FB.VIs to Czechoslovakia in 1948, 6 FB.VIs to Dominica, a few B.IVs, 57 FB.VIs, 29 PR.XVIs and 23 NF.XXXs to France. Some T.IIIs were exported to Israel along with 60 FB.VIs, and at least five PR.XVIs and 14 naval versions. Four T.IIIs, 76 FB.VIs, one FB.40 and four T.43s were exported to New Zealand. Three T.IIIs were exported to Norway, and 18 FB.VIs which were later converted to night fighter standard. South Africa received two F.II and 14 PR.XVI/XIs and Sweden received 46 NF.XIXs. Turkey received 96 FB.VIs and several T.IIIs, and Yugoslavia had 60 NF.38s, 80 FB.VIs and three T.IIIs delivered.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Bowman_2005.2C_p._163._1-1">[2]

Sites
Factory-fresh Mosquito B.XVIs built by Percival: visible serial numbers are PF563, 561 and 564.

Operators
Main article: List of de Havilland Mosquito operators{| border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 100%; table-layout: fixed;"
 * - valign="top"
 * Australia
 * Belgium
 * Burma
 * Canada
 * China
 * Czechoslovakia
 * Dominican Republic
 * France
 * Israel
 * New Zealand


 * Norway
 * Poland
 * South Africa
 * Soviet Union
 * Sweden
 * Turkey
 * Switzerland
 * United Kingdom
 * United States
 * Yugoslavia


 * }

Survivors
Main article: List of surviving de Havilland MosquitosOne aircraft, Mosquito FB.26 KA114, built in Canada in 1945, has recently completed restoration by Avspecs Ltd, Ardmore New Zealand and flew for the first time on Thursday 27 September 2012. The third, fourth, fifth and sixth flights were watched by several thousand spectators at a special air show at Ardmore on Saturday 29 September 2012. The restored Mosquito is owned by Jerry Yagen and is heading to its new home at the Virginia Military Aviation Museum, in Virginia Beach, USA, as soon as transport logisitics have been worked out. A complete set of forms, jigs and molds will allow for new Mosquitos to be built. <sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-157">[147]

16 years earlier, the then only airworthy Mosquito, a T3 RR299 G-ASKH "HT-E", was destroyed in an airshow accident at Barton, Manchester, England, on 21 July 1996, in which both aircrew were killed. In 1959 RR299 was based at Exeter Airport serving in the CAACU (Civilian Anti-aircraft Cooperation Unit) located there. There are approximately 30 non-flying examples around the world with several under restoration. The largest collection of Mosquitos is at the de Havilland Aircraft Heritage Centre, which owns three aircraft.

DH.98 Mosquito F Mk II
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 90%;">Data from Mosquito<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-jane_158-0">[148] and Mosquito Performance trials<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-Mosquito_performance_159-0">[149]

General characteristics Performance Armament
 * Crew: 2: pilot, navigator/radar operator
 * Length: 41 ft 2 in (13.57 m)
 * Wingspan: 54 ft 2 in (16.52 m)
 * Height: 17 ft 5 in (5.3 m)
 * Wing area: 454 ft² (42.18 m²)
 * Empty weight: 13,356 lb (6,058 kg)
 * Loaded weight: 17,700 lb (8,028 kg)
 * Max. takeoff weight: 18,649 lb (8,549 kg)
 * Powerplant: 2 × Rolls-Royce Merlin 21/21 or 23/23 (left/right) liquid-cooled V12 engine, 1,480 hp (21 & 23) (1,103 kW) each
 * Maximum speed: 318 kn (366 mph, 610 km/h) at 21,400 ft (6,500 m)<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-160">[150]
 * Range: 782 nmi (900 mi, 1,500 km) with 410 gal (1,864 litre) fuel load at 20,000 ft (6,100 m)
 * Service ceiling: 29,000 ft (8,839 m)
 * Rate of climb: 1,740 ft/min (8.8 m/s)
 * Wing loading: 39.9 lb/ft² (195 kg/m²)
 * Power/mass: 0.189 hp/lb (311 W/kg)

Avionics
 * Guns: 4 × 20 mm (.79 in) Hispano Mk II cannon (fuselage) and 4 × .303 in (7.7 mm) Browning machine guns (nose)


 * AI Mk IV or Mk V radar (NF variants)

DH.98 Mosquito B Mk XVI
<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 90%;">Data from Jane's Fighting Aircraft of World War II<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-jane_158-1">[148] and World War II Warbirds<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-ww2war_161-0">[151]

General characteristics Performance Armament
 * Crew: 2: pilot, bombardier/navigator
 * Length: 44 ft 6 in (13.57 m)
 * Wingspan: 54 ft 2 in (16.52 m)
 * Height: 17 ft 5 in (5.3 m)
 * Wing area: 454 ft² (42.18 m²)
 * Empty weight: 14,300 lb (6,490 kg)
 * Loaded weight: 18,100 lb (8,210 kg)
 * Max. takeoff weight: 25,000 lb (11,000 kg)
 * Powerplant: 2 × Rolls-Royce Merlin 76/77 (left/right) liquid-cooled V12 engine, 1,710 hp (1,280 kW) each
 * Maximum speed: 361 kn (415 mph, 668 km/h) at 28,000 ft (8,500 m)
 * Range: 1,300 nmi (1,500 mi, 2,400 km) with full weapons load
 * Service ceiling: 37,000 ft (11,000 m)
 * Rate of climb: 2,850 ft/min (14.5 m/s)
 * Wing loading: 39.9 lb/ft² (195 kg/m²)
 * Power/mass: 0.189 hp/lb (311 W/kg)

Avionics
 * Bombs: 4,000 lb (1,800 kg)


 * GEE radio-navigation

Notable appearances in media
Main article: Aircraft in fiction#de Havilland Mosquito== See also==
 * Oslo Mosquito raid
 * Operation Jericho, operation to break prison walls to help get French prisoners out.
 * Operation Carthage
 * Related development
 * de Havilland Hornet/Sea Hornet
 * Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era
 * Bristol Beaufighter
 * Douglas A-26 Invader
 * FMA I.Ae. 24 Calquin
 * Focke-Wulf Ta 154
 * Heinkel He 219
 * Junkers Ju 88
 * Messerschmitt Me 410
 * Northrop P-61 Black Widow
 * Petlyakov Pe-2
 * Related lists
 * List of aircraft of World War II
 * List of aircraft of the United Kingdom in World War II
 * List of fighter aircraft
 * List of bomber aircraft